Ad is loading...
FRNRX vs GHACX
FRNRX vs GHACX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs GHACX
Franklin Natural Resources A
Price$28.64
Change+$0.16 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.58M
VanEck Global Resources Fund C
Price$32.17
Change+$0.17 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets475.34M
FRNRX vs GHACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. GHACX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Buy and GHACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GHACX has more cash in the bank: 475M vs. FRNRX (300M). GHACX (2.36) and FRNRX (2.31) have matching dividends . FRNRX was incepted earlier than GHACX: FRNRX (30 years) vs GHACX (31 years). GHACX (2.45) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.02). GHACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FRNRX (11.86). FRNRX (1000) and GHACX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. GHACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.25 vs. FRNRX (-8.06). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 115.83 vs. GHACX (85.68).
| FRNRX | GHACX | FRNRX / GHACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.20 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 2.45 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.008 | 5.303 | 0% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 300M | 475M | 63% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.31 | 2.36 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.06 | -4.25 | 189% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.24 | -7.84 | -131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 115.83 | 85.68 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.62 | -7.43 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers