Ad is loading...
FROTX vs PCNTX
FROTX vs PCNTX Comparison
Open Charts FROTX vs PCNTX
Franklin Convertible Securities C
Price$21.67
Change+$0.08 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.68B
Putnam Convertible Securities R6
Price$24.86
Change+$0.11 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets480.53M
FROTX vs PCNTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FROTX vs. PCNTX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FROTX is a Sell and PCNTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FROTX has more cash in the bank: 2.68B vs. PCNTX (481M). PCNTX pays higher dividends than FROTX: PCNTX (2.34) vs FROTX (0.56). FROTX was incepted earlier than PCNTX: FROTX (30 years) vs PCNTX (7 years). FROTX (1.58) is less costly to investors than PCNTX (0.72). PCNTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FROTX (37.31). PCNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FROTX: PCNTX (0) vs FROTX (1000). PCNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.31 vs. FROTX (7.56). PCNTX return over 5 years is better than : 11.57 vs. FROTX (7.81).
| FROTX | PCNTX | FROTX / PCNTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.57 | 0.72 | 218% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 0.72 | 219% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.977 | -2.296 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.68B | 481M | 556% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 2.34 | 24% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.56 | 10.31 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.22 | 11.96 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.81 | 11.57 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.38 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...