Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRSAX vs PFFRX
FRSAX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRSAX vs. PFFRX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSAX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.71B vs. FRSAX (401M). PFFRX pays higher dividends than FRSAX: PFFRX (7.93) vs FRSAX (6.90). FRSAX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: FRSAX (14 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). FRSAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.70). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.50 vs. FRSAX (6.00). FRSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: FRSAX (1500) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. FRSAX (5.47). PFFRX return over 5 years is better than : 39.90 vs. FRSAX (26.46).
| FRSAX | PFFRX | FRSAX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 0.70 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.70 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.039 | 1.404 | 74% |
| Front Load | 1% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2500 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 401M | 4.71B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.90 | 7.93 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.47 | 7.25 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.78 | 27.93 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.46 | 39.90 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.22 | 58.31 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement