FRZCF
Price
$1.30
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
MDV
Price
$15.96
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
125 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FRZCF vs MDV

Header iconFRZCF vs MDV Comparison
Open Charts FRZCF vs MDVBanner chart's image
Frasers Centrepoint Trust
Price$1.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.98K
CapitalizationN/A
Modiv Industrial
Price$15.96
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$33.94K
CapitalizationN/A
FRZCF vs MDV Comparison Chart
Loading...
MDV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRZCF vs. MDV commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRZCF is a Hold and MDV is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (FRZCF: $1.30 vs. MDV: $15.96)
Brand notoriety: FRZCF and MDV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRZCF: 260% vs. MDV: 89%
Market capitalization -- FRZCF: $2.77B vs. MDV: $151.72M
FRZCF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.77B. MDV’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $151.72M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRZCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMDV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRZCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MDV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDV is a better buy in the long-term than FRZCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MDV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MDV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

FRZCF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -15.03% price change this week, while MDV (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -6.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

MDV is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.10% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRZCF($2.77B) has a higher market cap than MDV($152M). MDV has higher P/E ratio than FRZCF: MDV (92.69) vs FRZCF (18.45). MDV YTD gains are higher at: 23.431 vs. FRZCF (-25.287). FRZCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 275M vs. MDV (24.4M). FRZCF has more cash in the bank: 24.6M vs. MDV (3.13M). MDV has less debt than FRZCF: MDV (280M) vs FRZCF (2.2B). FRZCF has higher revenues than MDV: FRZCF (368M) vs MDV (46.9M).
FRZCFMDVFRZCF / MDV
Capitalization2.77B152M1,824%
EBITDA275M24.4M1,127%
Gain YTD-25.28723.431-108%
P/E Ratio18.4592.6920%
Revenue368M46.9M785%
Total Cash24.6M3.13M786%
Total Debt2.2B280M785%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRZCF: Fundamental Ratings
FRZCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MDV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MDV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LEGHX12.460.01
+0.08%
BrandywineGLOBAL - Small Cap Value R
JGYAX12.29N/A
N/A
JHancock Global Shareholder Yield A
GLECX15.12N/A
N/A
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd C Shares
CENTX12.29-0.05
-0.41%
Centerstone Investors I
FHCCX49.15-0.44
-0.89%
Fidelity Advisor Health Care C

FRZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRZCF has been loosely correlated with STKAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRZCF jumps, then STKAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRZCF
1D Price
Change %
FRZCF100%
-14.47%
STKAF - FRZCF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
NTSGF - FRZCF
46%
Loosely correlated
+8.31%
NRWRF - FRZCF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PRKWF - FRZCF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CPAMF - FRZCF
30%
Poorly correlated
-10.23%
More

MDV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MDV and BTBIF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MDV and BTBIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDV
1D Price
Change %
MDV100%
-1.36%
BTBIF - MDV
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
FRZCF - MDV
22%
Poorly correlated
-14.47%
PLYM - MDV
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
PK - MDV
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
CUBE - MDV
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.76%
More