Ad is loading...
FSAGX vs UNWPX
FSAGX vs UNWPX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UNWPX
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$35.60
Change-$0.51 (-1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
US Global Investors World Prec Mnral
Price$1.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.11M
FSAGX vs UNWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UNWPX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Hold and UNWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. UNWPX (45.1M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UNWPX: FSAGX (2.71) vs UNWPX (0.00). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UNWPX: FSAGX (39 years) vs UNWPX (39 years). UNWPX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.68). UNWPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. FSAGX (17.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UNWPX: FSAGX (0) vs UNWPX (5000). FSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.93 vs. UNWPX (20.51). FSAGX return over 5 years is better than : 47.10 vs. UNWPX (22.35).
| FSAGX | UNWPX | FSAGX / UNWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.47 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.74 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 46.908 | 27.027 | 174% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 45.1M | 4,286% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 51.93 | 20.51 | 253% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.12 | -18.61 | -205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.10 | 22.35 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.72 | 25.15 | 508% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...