Ad is loading...
FSAGX vs UNWPX
FSAGX vs UNWPX Comparison
Open Charts FSAGX vs UNWPX
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$32.35
Change+$2.14 (+7.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
US Global Investors World Prec Mnral
Price$1.72
Change+$0.11 (+6.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.22M
FSAGX vs UNWPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSAGX vs. UNWPX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSAGX is a Buy and UNWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. UNWPX (39.2M). FSAGX pays higher dividends than UNWPX: FSAGX (2.71) vs UNWPX (0.00). FSAGX was incepted earlier than UNWPX: FSAGX (39 years) vs UNWPX (39 years). UNWPX (1.74) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.70). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. UNWPX (21.00). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than UNWPX: FSAGX (0) vs UNWPX (5000). FSAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.50 vs. UNWPX (11.69). FSAGX return over 5 years is better than : 40.40 vs. UNWPX (24.37).
| FSAGX | UNWPX | FSAGX / UNWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.47 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 1.74 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.905 | 16.216 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.93B | 39.2M | 4,931% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.50 | 11.69 | 252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.01 | -33.07 | -9% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.40 | 24.37 | 166% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.77 | 21.24 | 460% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers