FSBC
Price
$29.54
Change
+$0.68 (+2.36%)
Updated
Sep 13 closing price
35 days until earnings call
LARK
Price
$20.20
Change
-$0.01 (-0.05%)
Updated
Sep 16, 09:30 AM (EDT)
43 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSBC vs LARK

Header iconFSBC vs LARK Comparison
Open Charts FSBC vs LARKBanner chart's image
Five Star Ban
Price$29.54
Change+$0.68 (+2.36%)
Volume$28.9K
CapitalizationN/A
Landmark Ban
Price$20.20
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FSBC vs LARK Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FSBC vs. LARK commentary
Sep 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBC is a StrongBuy and LARK is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2024
Stock price -- (FSBC: $29.54 vs. LARK: $20.21)
Brand notoriety: FSBC and LARK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSBC: 54% vs. LARK: 36%
Market capitalization -- FSBC: $390.45M vs. LARK: $105.44M
FSBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $390.45M. LARK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $105.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLARK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LARK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LARK is a better buy in the long-term than FSBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSBC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FSBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FSBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.09% price change this week, while LARK (@Regional Banks) price change was -3.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2024.

LARK is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSBC($390M) has a higher market cap than LARK($105M). LARK has higher P/E ratio than FSBC: LARK (8.64) vs FSBC (7.99). FSBC YTD gains are higher at: 15.672 vs. LARK (5.375). LARK has less debt than FSBC: LARK (99M) vs FSBC (249M). FSBC has higher revenues than LARK: FSBC (117M) vs LARK (56.5M).
FSBCLARKFSBC / LARK
Capitalization390M105M371%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.6725.375292%
P/E Ratio7.998.6492%
Revenue117M56.5M207%
Total Cash27MN/A-
Total Debt249M99M252%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LARK: Fundamental Ratings
LARK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
96
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
50
SMR RATING
1..100
51
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RTSCX32.130.66
+2.10%
Russell Inv Tax-Managed US Mid&Sm Cap C
ADNCX11.760.19
+1.64%
American Beacon ARK Transfmt Innov C
FCCGX24.280.34
+1.41%
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth C
KTRZX10.160.08
+0.79%
DWS Global Income Builder R6
SEEFX20.000.03
+0.15%
Saturna Sustainable Equity

FSBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBC has been closely correlated with RBB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBC jumps, then RBB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBC
1D Price
Change %
FSBC100%
+2.36%
RBB - FSBC
73%
Closely correlated
+2.55%
STBA - FSBC
73%
Closely correlated
+2.82%
FMBH - FSBC
73%
Closely correlated
+2.34%
BUSE - FSBC
72%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
GSBC - FSBC
72%
Closely correlated
+2.70%
More