Five Star Bancorp, the holding company for California-based Five Star Bank, has built its reputation on organic, relationship-driven growth. Its second-quarter 2026 results arrive as investors weigh the bank's rapid expansion across California against the rising costs and margin compression that often accompany fast balance-sheet growth. The report matters because it tests whether the company can sustain double-digit loan and deposit momentum while protecting profitability. Prior quarters showed strong earnings beats and accelerating growth, but also a steady drift in net interest margin. With the Federal Reserve's rate backdrop shifting and competition for deposits intensifying, this quarter offers a clearer read on whether Five Star's growth strategy is translating into durable shareholder value. I also checked this using Tickeron’s AI Screener to see how the stock compares to others in the industry.
Five Star Bancorp reported net income of $19.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, a 4% increase from $18.6 million in the first quarter of 2026 and a 34% jump from $14.5 million in the year-ago period. Diluted earnings per share reached $0.91, up $0.04 sequentially and $0.23 year over year, and above the $0.85 consensus estimate.
Net interest income rose 6.04% to $46.1 million, driven primarily by higher loan volumes, though net interest margin compressed by seven basis points to 3.63%. Non-interest income increased to $1.9 million from $1.6 million. Total loans held for investment climbed about $306.3 million, or 29% annualized, to roughly $4.5 billion, while total deposits grew roughly $330 million, or 30% annualized. Non-wholesale deposits surged $463.1 million, more than offsetting a $133.1 million decline in higher-cost wholesale funding.
On the expense side, the efficiency ratio rose to 40.91% from 38.57%, reflecting higher advertising, promotional, and data-processing costs tied to growth. The company recorded a $2.3 million provision for credit losses, largely reflecting loan growth, and noted an increase in non-performing loans to 0.30% of total loans, tied mainly to one CRA loan.
Despite the earnings beat, Five Star Bancorp shares fell roughly 4% in the session following the release, closing near $46.41. The muted reaction reflected investor concerns that outweighed the headline profit growth. Management announced an underwritten public offering of common stock, which raised dilution worries among existing shareholders. At the same time, the narrowing net interest margin and higher efficiency ratio signaled that the bank's rapid expansion is beginning to pressure profitability. The earnings call also did not include a question-and-answer session, citing a pending settlement, which limited management's ability to directly address investor concerns in real time. Taken together, sentiment remained cautious even as the underlying operating results demonstrated continued momentum in loans and core deposits.
Looking ahead, investors will be watching whether Five Star Bancorp can keep growing its loan and deposit base without further eroding its net interest margin. The bank's shift toward relationship-based, non-wholesale deposits is a positive for funding stability, but rapid growth has diluted the overall yield on earning assets and pushed expenses higher. Management's ability to control costs as it hires new teams and expands its California footprint will be central to the next several quarters.
Credit quality also deserves close attention. While the increase in non-performing loans was concentrated in a single well-collateralized CRA loan, any further deterioration would test the bank's conservative underwriting claims. The completed stock offering will dilute per-share earnings, so investors should monitor how management deploys the new capital.
Finally, the interest-rate environment remains a key variable. With a meaningful portion of the loan book adjustable or floating, Five Star is positioned to respond to rate shifts, but margin direction will hinge on deposit pricing competition and the pace of wholesale deposit runoff. Analysts currently project third-quarter EPS near $0.91 and full-year 2026 EPS around $3.55, providing a benchmark against which future performance will be measured. From what I see, this is important because it highlights the balance between growth and profitability.
In my own research process, I often turn to Tickeron’s AI Screener to quickly filter regional banks by fundamentals and technical signals. It helps surface comparable names and emerging patterns without spending hours on manual screens. The tool has become a regular part of how I cross-check earnings trends and peer performance before forming a view on names like this one.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
Sergey Savastiouk, Ph.D. has a degree in Applied Mathematics from Moscow University and has extensive experience as an entrepreneur, investor, manager, and mathematician. His professional expertise is in applied mathematics, mathematical modeling, system and pattern analysis, and software and hardware system integration. He has served as the CEO of several hi-tech start-up companies and nonprofit organizations, which has given him proven capabilities in business strategy for high-tech start-up companies, market assessment, company formation, team building, product development, marketing, and sales. He has published numerous articles in journals and magazines on related fields. As a retail investor, he spent 15 years developing his proprietary trading and quantitative algorithms (now Tickeron’s A.I.), which brought him significant returns in trading the stock market. His current work and goal in founding Tickeron is to bring professional, sophisticated stock market analysis capabilities to retail investors via an easy-to-use interface.
FSBC saw its Momentum Indicator move above the 0 level on October 21, 2026. This is an indication that the stock could be shifting in to a new upward move. Traders may want to consider buying the stock or buying call options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 97 similar instances where the indicator turned positive. In 73 of the 97 cases, the stock moved higher in the following days. The odds of a move higher are at 75%.
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FSBC's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 21 of 29 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FSBC just turned positive on October 13, 2026. Looking at past instances where FSBC's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 30 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
Following a +3.02% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FSBC advanced for three days, in 206 of 299 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 69%.
The Stochastic Oscillator has been in the overbought zone for 1 day. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FSBC declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.
FSBC broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for FSBC entered a downward trend on October 12, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 19 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 56, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 28 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 46 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FSBC’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 52 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 99 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: FSBC's P/B Ratio (2.305) is slightly higher than the industry average of (1.271). P/E Ratio (13.127) is within average values for comparable stocks, (13.247). FSBC's Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (63.840) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (1.190). Dividend Yield (0.022) settles around the average of (0.035) among similar stocks. FSBC's P/S Ratio (5.444) is slightly higher than the industry average of (3.738).
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
a savings bank
Industry RegionalBanks