FSBC
Price
$27.75
Change
-$0.35 (-1.25%)
Updated
May 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
390.45M
67 days until earnings call
MBWM
Price
$44.32
Change
-$0.19 (-0.43%)
Updated
May 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
605.34M
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSBC vs MBWM

Header iconFSBC vs MBWM Comparison
Open Charts FSBC vs MBWMBanner chart's image
Five Star Ban
Price$27.75
Change-$0.35 (-1.25%)
Volume$888
Capitalization390.45M
Mercantile Bank
Price$44.32
Change-$0.19 (-0.43%)
Volume$100
Capitalization605.34M
FSBC vs MBWM Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSBC vs. MBWM commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBC is a Hold and MBWM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (FSBC: $28.10 vs. MBWM: $44.51)
Brand notoriety: FSBC and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSBC: 38% vs. MBWM: 70%
Market capitalization -- FSBC: $390.45M vs. MBWM: $605.34M
FSBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $390.45M. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $605.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSBC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than FSBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSBC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the short-term than FSBC.

Price Growth

FSBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.54% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.72% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBWM($605M) has a higher market cap than FSBC($390M). FSBC has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: FSBC (7.99) vs MBWM (7.32). MBWM YTD gains are higher at: 0.861 vs. FSBC (-5.323). MBWM has more cash in the bank: 64.6M vs. FSBC (27M). FSBC has less debt than MBWM: FSBC (249M) vs MBWM (607M). MBWM has higher revenues than FSBC: MBWM (226M) vs FSBC (117M).
FSBCMBWMFSBC / MBWM
Capitalization390M605M64%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.3230.861-619%
P/E Ratio7.997.32109%
Revenue117M226M52%
Total Cash27M64.6M42%
Total Debt249M607M41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
14
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSBCMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSAIX24.15N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs China Equity Instl
FBTDX100.89N/A
N/A
Franklin Biotechnology Discovery C
JVAPX37.22N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Value Advantage R3
LDFOX15.69N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F3
PMIRX10.65N/A
N/A
Putnam Multi-Asset Income R

FSBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBC has been closely correlated with EQBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBC jumps, then EQBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBC
1D Price
Change %
FSBC100%
-2.94%
EQBK - FSBC
87%
Closely correlated
-3.15%
TCBK - FSBC
85%
Closely correlated
-2.53%
FFIN - FSBC
85%
Closely correlated
-2.94%
MBWM - FSBC
85%
Closely correlated
-3.20%
SHBI - FSBC
84%
Closely correlated
-3.07%
More

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with PEBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then PEBO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
-3.20%
PEBO - MBWM
91%
Closely correlated
-3.34%
TCBK - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-2.53%
HOPE - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-3.30%
FBK - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-3.46%
THFF - MBWM
89%
Closely correlated
-2.39%
More