It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FSBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePROV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FSBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PROV’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
FSBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -9.21% price change this week, while PROV (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.56%.
FSBC is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2025.
PROV is expected to report earnings on Feb 03, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
FSBC | PROV | FSBC / PROV | |
Capitalization | 390M | 92.7M | 421% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 20.070 | 34.671 | 58% |
P/E Ratio | 7.99 | 12.10 | 66% |
Revenue | 117M | 40.3M | 290% |
Total Cash | 27M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 249M | 242M | 103% |
PROV | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FSBC | PROV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago48% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago43% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago61% | 2 days ago41% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago42% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago54% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago66% | 2 days ago53% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago69% | 3 days ago57% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 9 days ago50% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago45% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago62% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBC has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBC jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSBC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FSBC | 100% | -6.25% | ||
THFF - FSBC | 78% Closely correlated | -5.39% | ||
UBSI - FSBC | 77% Closely correlated | -5.62% | ||
FMBH - FSBC | 77% Closely correlated | -5.21% | ||
STBA - FSBC | 77% Closely correlated | -6.14% | ||
FFIN - FSBC | 77% Closely correlated | -6.30% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PROV and RNST have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PROV and RNST's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PROV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PROV | 100% | -1.15% | ||
RNST - PROV | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.39% | ||
MNSB - PROV | 32% Poorly correlated | -8.59% | ||
FFIC - PROV | 30% Poorly correlated | -4.74% | ||
FSBC - PROV | 28% Poorly correlated | -6.25% | ||
FUNC - PROV | 27% Poorly correlated | -3.86% | ||
More |