Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBCX vs RIEBX
FSBCX vs RIEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSBCX vs RIEBX
Federated Hermes Global Allocation C
Price$21.00
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets278.23M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2E
Price$26.85
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets135.73B
FSBCX vs RIEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBCX vs. RIEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBCX is a Buy and RIEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIEBX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FSBCX (278M). RIEBX pays higher dividends than FSBCX: RIEBX (3.23) vs FSBCX (1.38). FSBCX was incepted earlier than RIEBX: FSBCX (32 years) vs RIEBX (11 years). FSBCX (2.20) is less costly to investors than RIEBX (1.07). FSBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. RIEBX (92.00). RIEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSBCX: RIEBX (250) vs FSBCX (1500). RIEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.02 vs. FSBCX (12.08). RIEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.53 vs. FSBCX (13.21).
| FSBCX | RIEBX | FSBCX / RIEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.95 | 1.07 | 182% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.20 | 1.07 | 206% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.835 | 11.508 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 250 | 600% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 278M | 136B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.38 | 3.23 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.08 | 13.02 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.35 | 25.27 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.21 | 38.53 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.29 | 46.68 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement