Ad is loading...
FSBDX vs GFAFX
FSBDX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FSBDX vs GFAFX
Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth
Price$16.33
Change-$1.25 (-7.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.03B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$66.25
Change-$3.95 (-5.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
FSBDX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBDX vs. GFAFX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBDX is a Hold and GFAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. FSBDX (11B). FSBDX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: FSBDX (0.74) vs GFAFX (0.35). FSBDX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FSBDX (11 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FSBDX (0.01). FSBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). FSBDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FSBDX (0) vs GFAFX (250). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.16 vs. FSBDX (-1.42). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 71.15 vs. FSBDX (48.46).
| FSBDX | GFAFX | FSBDX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.67 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.67 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.391 | -4.826 | 236% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11B | 280B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.35 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.42 | 0.16 | -873% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.42 | 5.18 | 413% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.46 | 71.15 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.84 | 60.48 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers