Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSBDX vs GFAFX
FSBDX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FSBDX vs GFAFX
Fidelity Series Blue Chip Growth
Price$22.14
Change-$0.05 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.96B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$84.28
Change-$0.05 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
FSBDX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSBDX vs. GFAFX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBDX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. FSBDX (14B). FSBDX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: FSBDX (0.60) vs GFAFX (0.30). FSBDX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FSBDX (12 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FSBDX (0.01). FSBDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. GFAFX (25.00). FSBDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FSBDX (0) vs GFAFX (250). FSBDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.41 vs. GFAFX (14.63). GFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.21 vs. FSBDX (14.48).
| FSBDX | GFAFX | FSBDX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.67 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.67 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.593 | 14.262 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14B | 329B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.30 | 200% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.41 | 14.63 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.76 | 42.59 | 180% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.48 | 44.21 | 33% |
| Returns for 10 years | 72.69 | 87.27 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement