FSBW
Price
$42.50
Change
+$0.32 (+0.76%)
Updated
Jul 14 closing price
Capitalization
270.94M
9 days until earnings call
MOFG
Price
$30.07
Change
-$0.60 (-1.96%)
Updated
Jul 15, 01:42 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
369.19M
9 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSBW vs MOFG

Header iconFSBW vs MOFG Comparison
Open Charts FSBW vs MOFGBanner chart's image
FS Ban
Price$42.50
Change+$0.32 (+0.76%)
Volume$11.25K
Capitalization270.94M
MidWestOne Financial Gp
Price$30.07
Change-$0.60 (-1.96%)
Volume$100
Capitalization369.19M
FSBW vs MOFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSBW vs. MOFG commentary
Jul 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSBW is a StrongBuy and MOFG is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 15, 2025
Stock price -- (FSBW: $42.50 vs. MOFG: $30.67)
Brand notoriety: FSBW and MOFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSBW: 63% vs. MOFG: 170%
Market capitalization -- FSBW: $270.94M vs. MOFG: $369.19M
FSBW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $270.94M. MOFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $369.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSBW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMOFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSBW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MOFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSBW is a better buy in the long-term than MOFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSBW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSBW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MOFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSBW is a better buy in the short-term than MOFG.

Price Growth

FSBW (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.71% price change this week, while MOFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSBW is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

MOFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.77% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOFG($369M) has a higher market cap than FSBW($271M). MOFG has higher P/E ratio than FSBW: MOFG (17.17) vs FSBW (7.32). MOFG YTD gains are higher at: 7.071 vs. FSBW (4.953). MOFG has more cash in the bank: 71M vs. FSBW (18.1M). FSBW has less debt than MOFG: FSBW (150M) vs MOFG (418M). MOFG has higher revenues than FSBW: MOFG (163M) vs FSBW (141M).
FSBWMOFGFSBW / MOFG
Capitalization271M369M73%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.9537.07170%
P/E Ratio7.3217.1743%
Revenue141M163M87%
Total Cash18.1M71M25%
Total Debt150M418M36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSBW vs MOFG: Fundamental Ratings
FSBW
MOFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2411
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1946
SMR RATING
1..100
2739
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
329
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8595

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSBW's Valuation (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (80). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (46). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's SMR Rating (27) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (39). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSBW's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (48). This means that FSBW’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSBW (32). This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to FSBW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSBWMOFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEIJF0.08N/A
N/A
Beijing North Star Corp.
SWZCF702.36N/A
N/A
Swisscom AG
DEWY2.16N/A
N/A
Dewey Electronics Corp. (The)
HUQVF6.53N/A
N/A
Husqvarna AB
LKSGF0.01N/A
N/A
Luks Group Vietnam Holdings Co., Ltd.

FSBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSBW has been closely correlated with AROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSBW jumps, then AROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSBW
1D Price
Change %
FSBW100%
+0.76%
AROW - FSBW
79%
Closely correlated
+2.03%
FCBC - FSBW
79%
Closely correlated
+2.26%
CAC - FSBW
79%
Closely correlated
+2.18%
TCBK - FSBW
78%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
CCBG - FSBW
78%
Closely correlated
+2.87%
More