Ad is loading...
FSCPX vs RYLCX
FSCPX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSCPX vs RYLCX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discret Port
Price$54.46
Change+$0.47 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets468.29M
Rydex Leisure C
Price$64.36
Change+$0.62 (+0.97%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.02M
FSCPX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCPX vs. RYLCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCPX is a Buy and RYLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 468M vs. RYLCX (9.02M). RYLCX pays higher dividends than FSCPX: RYLCX (0.59) vs FSCPX (0.07). FSCPX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FSCPX (35 years) vs RYLCX (24 years). RYLCX (2.43) is less costly to investors than FSCPX (0.70). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 214.00 vs. FSCPX (33.00). FSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FSCPX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). RYLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSCPX: RYLCX (1000) vs FSCPX (500). RYLCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.44 vs. FSCPX (-6.31). RYLCX return over 5 years is better than : 35.54 vs. FSCPX (20.80).
| FSCPX | RYLCX | FSCPX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.40 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 2.43 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -20.743 | -7.864 | 264% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 468M | 9.02M | 5,190% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.07 | 0.59 | 12% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.31 | 7.44 | -85% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.36 | 7.17 | -47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.80 | 35.54 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.41 | 24.68 | 229% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers