Ad is loading...
FSCPX vs RYLCX
FSCPX vs RYLCX Comparison
Open Charts FSCPX vs RYLCX
Fidelity Select Consumer Discret Port
Price$73.68
Change+$0.34 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Rydex Leisure C
Price$69.98
Change-$0.35 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FSCPX vs RYLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCPX vs. RYLCX commentary
Dec 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCPX is a Buy and RYLCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSCPX has more cash in the bank: 545M vs. RYLCX (7.82M). RYLCX pays higher dividends than FSCPX: RYLCX (0.07) vs FSCPX (0.04). FSCPX was incepted earlier than RYLCX: FSCPX (35 years) vs RYLCX (24 years). RYLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 145.00 vs. FSCPX (46.00). FSCPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLCX: FSCPX (0) vs RYLCX (2500). RYLCX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FSCPX: RYLCX (1000) vs FSCPX (500). FSCPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.35 vs. RYLCX (17.67). FSCPX return over 5 years is better than : 50.60 vs. RYLCX (14.45).
| FSCPX | RYLCX | FSCPX / RYLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 25.455 | 17.176 | 148% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 545M | 7.82M | 6,973% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.04 | 0.07 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.35 | 17.67 | 143% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.37 | 3.15 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.60 | 14.45 | 350% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.09 | 41.22 | 289% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...