Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCRX vs NAESX
FSCRX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCRX vs NAESX
FSCRX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCRX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCRX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 183B vs. FSCRX (2.25B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSCRX: NAESX (1.08) vs FSCRX (0.34). FSCRX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCRX (26 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FSCRX (0.91) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FSCRX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.21 vs. FSCRX (9.69). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 27.95 vs. FSCRX (-11.73).
| FSCRX | NAESX | FSCRX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.17 | 535% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.17 | 535% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.378 | 11.363 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 183B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 1.08 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.69 | 23.21 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.69 | 48.54 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.73 | 27.95 | -42% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.14 | 159.04 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers