Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSCRX vs NAESX
FSCRX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts FSCRX vs NAESX
FSCRX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSCRX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSCRX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. FSCRX (2.21B). NAESX pays higher dividends than FSCRX: NAESX (1.09) vs FSCRX (0.39). FSCRX was incepted earlier than NAESX: FSCRX (26 years) vs NAESX (66 years). FSCRX (0.66) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). FSCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). FSCRX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.03 vs. FSCRX (3.18). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.13 vs. FSCRX (-13.68).
| FSCRX | NAESX | FSCRX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.17 | 388% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.17 | 388% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.457 | 15.527 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.21B | 185B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.39 | 1.09 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.18 | 19.03 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.90 | 48.03 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.68 | 32.13 | -43% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.65 | 149.64 | -6% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers