Ad is loading...
FSEAX vs MGSEX
FSEAX vs MGSEX Comparison
Open Charts FSEAX vs MGSEX
Fidelity Emerging Asia
Price$51.05
Change-$0.48 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets999.36M
AMG Veritas Asia Pacific N
Price$64.09
Change-$0.22 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.24M
FSEAX vs MGSEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSEAX vs. MGSEX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSEAX is a Buy and MGSEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSEAX has more cash in the bank: 999M vs. MGSEX (84.2M). MGSEX pays higher dividends than FSEAX: MGSEX (0.46) vs FSEAX (0.00). FSEAX was incepted earlier than MGSEX: FSEAX (32 years) vs MGSEX (41 years). MGSEX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FSEAX (0.65). MGSEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. FSEAX (57.00). FSEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MGSEX: FSEAX (0) vs MGSEX (2000). FSEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.84 vs. MGSEX (9.78). FSEAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.91 vs. MGSEX (-37.48).
| FSEAX | MGSEX | FSEAX / MGSEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.17 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 1.29 | 50% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.898 | 6.650 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 999M | 84.2M | 1,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.46 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.84 | 9.78 | 193% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.35 | 8.13 | 669% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.91 | -37.48 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.38 | -30.71 | -135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers