FSFG
Price
$25.18
Change
-$0.36 (-1.41%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
115.29M
23 days until earnings call
HNVR
Price
$24.45
Change
+$0.45 (+1.87%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
107.14M
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSFG vs HNVR

Header iconFSFG vs HNVR Comparison
Open Charts FSFG vs HNVRBanner chart's image
First Savings Financial Group
Price$25.18
Change-$0.36 (-1.41%)
Volume$9.15K
Capitalization115.29M
Hanover Ban
Price$24.45
Change+$0.45 (+1.87%)
Volume$19.95K
Capitalization107.14M
FSFG vs HNVR Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HNVR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSFG vs. HNVR commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFG is a Hold and HNVR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FSFG: $25.18 vs. HNVR: $24.45)
Brand notoriety: FSFG and HNVR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSFG: 47% vs. HNVR: 75%
Market capitalization -- FSFG: $115.29M vs. HNVR: $107.14M
FSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $115.29M. HNVR’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $107.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHNVR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HNVR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, HNVR is a better buy in the long-term than FSFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HNVR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HNVR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the short-term than HNVR.

Price Growth

FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while HNVR (@Regional Banks) price change was +13.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

HNVR is expected to report earnings on Apr 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSFG($115M) has a higher market cap than HNVR($107M). FSFG has higher P/E ratio than HNVR: FSFG (18.62) vs HNVR (8.00). HNVR YTD gains are higher at: 6.051 vs. FSFG (-5.196). FSFG has more cash in the bank: 17.5M vs. HNVR (10.3M). HNVR has less debt than FSFG: HNVR (164M) vs FSFG (405M). FSFG has higher revenues than HNVR: FSFG (82.3M) vs HNVR (62.6M).
FSFGHNVRFSFG / HNVR
Capitalization115M107M107%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.1966.051-86%
P/E Ratio18.628.00233%
Revenue82.3M62.6M131%
Total Cash17.5M10.3M170%
Total Debt405M164M247%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
66
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
63
SMR RATING
1..100
48
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFGHNVR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
42%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
22%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HNVR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGWCX32.810.40
+1.23%
Virtus Silvant Focused Growth C
MKVFX13.250.08
+0.61%
MFS International Large Cap Value R3
GPGOX3.310.01
+0.30%
Grandeur Peak Global Opportunities Inv
LYRWX11.33N/A
N/A
Lyrical International Value Equity Instl
WISIX12.23-0.02
-0.16%
William Blair International Sm Cap Gr I

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with CHMG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then CHMG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
-1.41%
CHMG - FSFG
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
CFSB - FSFG
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
TCBI - FSFG
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
AMAL - FSFG
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
RBB - FSFG
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
More

HNVR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HNVR and EVBN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HNVR and EVBN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HNVR
1D Price
Change %
HNVR100%
+1.88%
EVBN - HNVR
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
FSFG - HNVR
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
PBHC - HNVR
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.73%
LNKB - HNVR
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
FNWB - HNVR
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.33%
More