FSFG
Price
$25.18
Change
-$0.36 (-1.41%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
115.29M
22 days until earnings call
LARK
Price
$24.00
Change
-$0.49 (-2.00%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
105.44M
15 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSFG vs LARK

Header iconFSFG vs LARK Comparison
Open Charts FSFG vs LARKBanner chart's image
First Savings Financial Group
Price$25.18
Change-$0.36 (-1.41%)
Volume$9.15K
Capitalization115.29M
Landmark Ban
Price$24.00
Change-$0.49 (-2.00%)
Volume$4.12K
Capitalization105.44M
FSFG vs LARK Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSFG vs. LARK commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFG is a Hold and LARK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (FSFG: $25.18 vs. LARK: $24.00)
Brand notoriety: FSFG and LARK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSFG: 47% vs. LARK: 69%
Market capitalization -- FSFG: $115.29M vs. LARK: $105.44M
FSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $115.29M. LARK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $105.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLARK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FSFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LARK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, LARK is a better buy in the long-term than FSFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LARK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LARK’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the short-term than LARK.

Price Growth

FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while LARK (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

LARK is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSFG($115M) has a higher market cap than LARK($105M). FSFG has higher P/E ratio than LARK: FSFG (18.62) vs LARK (8.64). LARK YTD gains are higher at: -0.042 vs. FSFG (-5.196). LARK has less debt than FSFG: LARK (99M) vs FSFG (405M). FSFG has higher revenues than LARK: FSFG (82.3M) vs LARK (56.5M).
FSFGLARKFSFG / LARK
Capitalization115M105M110%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.196-0.04212,475%
P/E Ratio18.628.64216%
Revenue82.3M56.5M146%
Total Cash17.5MN/A-
Total Debt405M99M409%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG vs LARK: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
LARK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6334
SMR RATING
1..100
4849
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9030
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LARK's Valuation (38) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (40) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

LARK's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (63) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's SMR Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (49) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.

LARK's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

LARK's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSFG (90) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFGLARK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
56%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LARK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MUSBX34.130.32
+0.95%
MFS Blended Research Core Equity B
AOTIX28.530.25
+0.88%
Virtus EM Opps Instl
FSKGX18.970.16
+0.85%
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6
BILSX9.670.06
+0.62%
BlackRock U.S. Insights Lon/Shr Eq Ins
MKVBX13.210.08
+0.61%
MFS International Large Cap Value A

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with CHMG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then CHMG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
-1.41%
CHMG - FSFG
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
CFSB - FSFG
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
TCBI - FSFG
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.25%
AMAL - FSFG
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.27%
RBB - FSFG
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
More

LARK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LARK and SSBI have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LARK and SSBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LARK
1D Price
Change %
LARK100%
-2.00%
SSBI - LARK
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.51%
ECBK - LARK
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
BANC - LARK
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
LCNB - LARK
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSFG - LARK
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.41%
More