It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FSFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLARK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FSFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LARK’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.17% price change this week, while LARK (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.71% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.
FSFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.
LARK is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
FSFG | LARK | FSFG / LARK | |
Capitalization | 115M | 105M | 110% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -5.196 | -0.042 | 12,475% |
P/E Ratio | 18.62 | 8.64 | 216% |
Revenue | 82.3M | 56.5M | 146% |
Total Cash | 17.5M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 405M | 99M | 409% |
FSFG | LARK | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 34 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 49 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 90 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LARK's Valuation (38) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (40) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.
LARK's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (63) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.
FSFG's SMR Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LARK (49) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to LARK’s over the last 12 months.
LARK's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.
LARK's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSFG (90) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LARK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.
FSFG | LARK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 13 days ago64% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 13 days ago52% | 13 days ago61% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 13 days ago61% | 13 days ago45% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 13 days ago55% | 13 days ago47% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 13 days ago54% | 13 days ago51% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 21 days ago67% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago50% | 13 days ago55% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago57% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 13 days ago56% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MUSBX | 34.13 | 0.32 | +0.95% |
MFS Blended Research Core Equity B | |||
AOTIX | 28.53 | 0.25 | +0.88% |
Virtus EM Opps Instl | |||
FSKGX | 18.97 | 0.16 | +0.85% |
Fidelity Growth Strategies K6 | |||
BILSX | 9.67 | 0.06 | +0.62% |
BlackRock U.S. Insights Lon/Shr Eq Ins | |||
MKVBX | 13.21 | 0.08 | +0.61% |
MFS International Large Cap Value A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with CHMG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then CHMG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FSFG | 100% | -1.41% | ||
CHMG - FSFG | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
CFSB - FSFG | 33% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
TCBI - FSFG | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.25% | ||
AMAL - FSFG | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.27% | ||
RBB - FSFG | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LARK and SSBI have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LARK and SSBI's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LARK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LARK | 100% | -2.00% | ||
SSBI - LARK | 31% Poorly correlated | +5.51% | ||
ECBK - LARK | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.98% | ||
BANC - LARK | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.02% | ||
LCNB - LARK | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FSFG - LARK | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.41% | ||
More |