FSFG
Price
$26.96
Change
-$1.46 (-5.14%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
54 days until earnings call
MCB
Price
$58.91
Change
-$3.97 (-6.31%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
28 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSFG vs MCB

Header iconFSFG vs MCB Comparison
Open Charts FSFG vs MCBBanner chart's image
First Savings Financial Group
Price$26.96
Change-$1.46 (-5.14%)
Volume$7.45K
CapitalizationN/A
Metropolitan Bank Holding
Price$58.91
Change-$3.97 (-6.31%)
Volume$76.63K
CapitalizationN/A
FSFG vs MCB Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSFG vs. MCB commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFG is a Buy and MCB is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (FSFG: $26.96 vs. MCB: $58.91)
Brand notoriety: FSFG and MCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSFG: 38% vs. MCB: 86%
Market capitalization -- FSFG: $115.29M vs. MCB: $404.02M
FSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $115.29M. MCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $404.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCB is a better buy in the long-term than FSFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the short-term than MCB.

Price Growth

FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.28% price change this week, while MCB (@Regional Banks) price change was -11.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.

MCB is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.30% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCB($404M) has a higher market cap than FSFG($115M). FSFG has higher P/E ratio than MCB: FSFG (18.62) vs MCB (5.27). FSFG YTD gains are higher at: 65.365 vs. MCB (6.374). FSFG has less debt than MCB: FSFG (405M) vs MCB (547M). MCB has higher revenues than FSFG: MCB (251M) vs FSFG (82.3M).
FSFGMCBFSFG / MCB
Capitalization115M404M28%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD65.3656.3741,025%
P/E Ratio18.625.27353%
Revenue82.3M251M33%
Total Cash17.5MN/A-
Total Debt405M547M74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG vs MCB: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
MCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8681
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
45
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5781
SMR RATING
1..100
4717
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
838
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCB's Valuation (45) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (54) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCB (81) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to MCB’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's SMR Rating (17) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCB (41) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to MCB’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSFG (83) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew significantly faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFGMCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBISX10.54N/A
N/A
DWS Global Macro A
FUFRX23.88-0.58
-2.37%
Franklin Utilities R6
FLCCX42.89-1.13
-2.57%
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap C
RYAZX204.89-8.91
-4.17%
Rydex S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value H
RPMAX15.90-1.33
-7.72%
Reinhart Genesis PMV Investor

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with CHMG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then CHMG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
-5.14%
CHMG - FSFG
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.72%
PFS - FSFG
34%
Loosely correlated
-6.14%
MCB - FSFG
33%
Loosely correlated
-6.31%
BWFG - FSFG
33%
Loosely correlated
-5.97%
CFSB - FSFG
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
More

MCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCB has been closely correlated with EBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCB jumps, then EBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCB
1D Price
Change %
MCB100%
-6.31%
EBC - MCB
77%
Closely correlated
-4.95%
THFF - MCB
77%
Closely correlated
-5.39%
BANF - MCB
76%
Closely correlated
-5.10%
CAC - MCB
76%
Closely correlated
-5.14%
FFBC - MCB
76%
Closely correlated
-5.70%
More