FSFG
Price
$24.62
Change
-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
115.29M
48 days until earnings call
MCB
Price
$52.47
Change
-$3.52 (-6.29%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
404.02M
37 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FSFG vs MCB

Header iconFSFG vs MCB Comparison
Open Charts FSFG vs MCBBanner chart's image
First Savings Financial Group
Price$24.62
Change-$0.04 (-0.16%)
Volume$100
Capitalization115.29M
Metropolitan Bank Holding
Price$52.47
Change-$3.52 (-6.29%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization404.02M
FSFG vs MCB Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSFG vs. MCB commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFG is a Buy and MCB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (FSFG: $24.66 vs. MCB: $55.99)
Brand notoriety: FSFG and MCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSFG: 86% vs. MCB: 129%
Market capitalization -- FSFG: $115.29M vs. MCB: $404.02M
FSFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $115.29M. MCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $404.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSFG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMCB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FSFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FSFG and MCB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSFG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSFG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MCB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the short-term than MCB.

Price Growth

FSFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.75% price change this week, while MCB (@Regional Banks) price change was -7.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

MCB is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCB($404M) has a higher market cap than FSFG($115M). FSFG has higher P/E ratio than MCB: FSFG (18.62) vs MCB (5.27). MCB YTD gains are higher at: -4.127 vs. FSFG (-7.154). FSFG has less debt than MCB: FSFG (405M) vs MCB (547M). MCB has higher revenues than FSFG: MCB (251M) vs FSFG (82.3M).
FSFGMCBFSFG / MCB
Capitalization115M404M28%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.154-4.127173%
P/E Ratio18.625.27353%
Revenue82.3M251M33%
Total Cash17.5MN/A-
Total Debt405M547M74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSFG vs MCB: Fundamental Ratings
FSFG
MCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6388
SMR RATING
1..100
4618
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9512
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCB's Valuation (34) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (37) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCB (88) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to MCB’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's SMR Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (46) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MCB (57) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to MCB’s over the last 12 months.

MCB's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSFG (95) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that MCB’s stock grew significantly faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSFGMCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ICTUX10.200.15
+1.49%
ICON Utilities and Income Instl
TESRX25.190.21
+0.84%
Franklin Mutual Shares R
AEYRX32.690.23
+0.71%
American Century Equity Growth R
STVTX10.160.05
+0.49%
Virtus Ceredex Large-Cap Value Equity I
TVRCX14.460.06
+0.42%
NAA Allocation Fund C

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with TCBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then TCBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
-1.40%
TCBI - FSFG
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.39%
CHMG - FSFG
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
MNSBP - FSFG
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AMAL - FSFG
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
CFSB - FSFG
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
More

MCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCB has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCB jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCB
1D Price
Change %
MCB100%
-1.17%
UBSI - MCB
77%
Closely correlated
-0.43%
EBC - MCB
77%
Closely correlated
-2.17%
CAC - MCB
77%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
HWC - MCB
77%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
PFS - MCB
77%
Closely correlated
-0.75%
More