Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSFRX vs PIPNX
FSFRX vs PIPNX Comparison
Open Charts FSFRX vs PIPNX
Nuveen Strategic Income R6
Price$9.88
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
FSFRX vs PIPNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSFRX vs. PIPNX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFRX is a Hold and PIPNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PIPNX has more cash in the bank: 182B vs. FSFRX (1.08B). FSFRX pays higher dividends than PIPNX: FSFRX (6.72) vs PIPNX (6.06). FSFRX was incepted earlier than PIPNX: FSFRX (10 years) vs PIPNX (7 years). PIPNX (1.03) is less costly to investors than FSFRX (0.57). PIPNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 588.00 vs. FSFRX (60.00). FSFRX (1000000) and PIPNX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PIPNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.57 vs. FSFRX (7.01). PIPNX return over 5 years is better than : 21.88 vs. FSFRX (17.83).
| FSFRX | PIPNX | FSFRX / PIPNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.98 | 47% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.03 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.065 | 3.922 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 182B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.72 | 6.06 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 7.57 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.53 | 21.81 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.83 | 21.88 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers