Ad is loading...
FSFRX vs PONPX
FSFRX vs PONPX Comparison
Open Charts FSFRX vs PONPX
Nuveen Strategic Income R6
Price$9.82
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
FSFRX vs PONPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSFRX vs. PONPX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFRX is a Hold and PONPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PONPX has more cash in the bank: 182B vs. FSFRX (1.06B). FSFRX pays higher dividends than PONPX: FSFRX (6.61) vs PONPX (6.07). FSFRX was incepted earlier than PONPX: FSFRX (10 years) vs PONPX (17 years). PONPX (0.93) is less costly to investors than FSFRX (0.57). PONPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 588.00 vs. FSFRX (60.00). FSFRX (1000000) and PONPX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PONPX (8.79) and FSFRX (8.50) have marching annual gain over last year. PONPX return over 5 years is better than : 25.50 vs. FSFRX (21.97).
| FSFRX | PONPX | FSFRX / PONPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 0.93 | 49% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.93 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.404 | 2.599 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 182B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.61 | 6.07 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.50 | 8.79 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.33 | 16.66 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.97 | 25.50 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.75 | 50.22 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...