Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSFRX vs PONRX
FSFRX vs PONRX Comparison
Open Charts FSFRX vs PONRX
Nuveen Strategic Income R6
Price$9.88
Change+$0.02 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.07B
FSFRX vs PONRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSFRX vs. PONRX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSFRX is a Hold and PONRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PONRX has more cash in the bank: 182B vs. FSFRX (1.08B). FSFRX pays higher dividends than PONRX: FSFRX (6.72) vs PONRX (5.56). FSFRX was incepted earlier than PONRX: FSFRX (10 years) vs PONRX (18 years). PONRX (1.48) is less costly to investors than FSFRX (0.57). PONRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 588.00 vs. FSFRX (60.00). PONRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSFRX: PONRX (0) vs FSFRX (1000000). PONRX (7.03) and FSFRX (7.01) have marching annual gain over last year. PONRX return over 5 years is better than : 18.86 vs. FSFRX (17.83).
| FSFRX | PONRX | FSFRX / PONRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.46 | 1.48 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 1.48 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.065 | 3.705 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 182B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.72 | 5.56 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.01 | 7.03 | 100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.53 | 19.99 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.83 | 18.86 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.08 | 44.40 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers