Ad is loading...
FSGCX vs PDBSX
FSGCX vs PDBSX Comparison
Open Charts FSGCX vs PDBSX
Franklin Core Plus Bond Fund C
Price$8.25
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.45B
PGIM Total Return Bond R4
Price$11.94
Change+$0.04 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets48.72B
FSGCX vs PDBSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGCX vs. PDBSX commentary
Apr 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGCX is a Hold and PDBSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDBSX has more cash in the bank: 48.7B vs. FSGCX (2.45B). PDBSX pays higher dividends than FSGCX: PDBSX (4.49) vs FSGCX (4.26). FSGCX was incepted earlier than PDBSX: FSGCX (27 years) vs PDBSX (7 years). FSGCX (1.36) is less costly to investors than PDBSX (0.68). PDBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 113.00 vs. FSGCX (65.73). PDBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSGCX: PDBSX (0) vs FSGCX (1000). PDBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.52 vs. FSGCX (6.41). FSGCX return over 5 years is better than : 15.21 vs. PDBSX (0.71).
| FSGCX | PDBSX | FSGCX / PDBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.25 | 0.64 | 195% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 0.68 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.023 | 1.614 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.45B | 48.7B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.26 | 4.49 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 7.52 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.69 | 4.39 | 198% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.21 | 0.71 | 2,154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.21 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...