FSGCY
Price
$6.37
Change
-$0.03 (-0.47%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
SMTLF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
101.13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSGCY vs SMTLF

Header iconFSGCY vs SMTLF Comparison
Open Charts FSGCY vs SMTLFBanner chart's image
First Gen
Price$6.37
Change-$0.03 (-0.47%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.34B
GCL New Energy Holdings
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$332
Capitalization101.13M
FSGCY vs SMTLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SMTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSGCY vs. SMTLF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGCY is a Hold and SMTLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FSGCY: $6.37 vs. SMTLF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: FSGCY and SMTLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Alternative Power Generation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSGCY: 426% vs. SMTLF: 122%
Market capitalization -- FSGCY: $1.34B vs. SMTLF: $101.13M
FSGCY [@Alternative Power Generation] is valued at $1.34B. SMTLF’s [@Alternative Power Generation] market capitalization is $101.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry ranges from $118.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Alternative Power Generation] industry is $7.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSGCY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMTLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSGCY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMTLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSGCY is a better buy in the long-term than SMTLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMTLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMTLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FSGCY (@Alternative Power Generation) experienced а -2.12% price change this week, while SMTLF (@Alternative Power Generation) price change was -7.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Alternative Power Generation industry was -2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.65%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Alternative Power Generation (-2.60% weekly)

The alternative power generation industry consists of companies that operate power facilities converting non-conventional forms of energy into electricity. These energy forms are alternatives to fossil fuels, and many of them are derived from natural resources. Alternative energy forms include solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal steam. A major purpose behind using alternative energy – also called ‘clean’ energy - is to address concerns related to the more conventional fossil fuels, such as the latter’s high carbon dioxide emissions which is often considered a factor in global warming. Alternative power generation has been gaining traction in recent years, and could grow further in the future. Large organizations like Google have invested substantially in wind and solar energy-powered electricity. Some of the prominent U.S. companies operating in the alternative power generation industry includes Ormat Technologies, Inc., TerraForm Power, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners LP.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGCY($1.34B) has a higher market cap than SMTLF($101M). FSGCY YTD gains are higher at: -3.569 vs. SMTLF (-37.907). SMTLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.99B vs. FSGCY (805M). SMTLF has more cash in the bank: 586M vs. FSGCY (342M). FSGCY has less debt than SMTLF: FSGCY (1.64B) vs SMTLF (6.61B). SMTLF (2.85B) and FSGCY (2.75B) have equivalent revenues.
FSGCYSMTLFFSGCY / SMTLF
Capitalization1.34B101M1,329%
EBITDA805M1.99B41%
Gain YTD-3.569-37.9079%
P/E Ratio3.94N/A-
Revenue2.75B2.85B97%
Total Cash342M586M58%
Total Debt1.64B6.61B25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSGCY vs SMTLF: Fundamental Ratings
FSGCY
SMTLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9596
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
72100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7488
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5046

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSGCY's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMTLF (74). This means that FSGCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMTLF’s over the last 12 months.

FSGCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SMTLF (100). This means that FSGCY’s stock grew similarly to SMTLF’s over the last 12 months.

FSGCY's SMR Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as SMTLF (100). This means that FSGCY’s stock grew similarly to SMTLF’s over the last 12 months.

FSGCY's Price Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as SMTLF (88). This means that FSGCY’s stock grew similarly to SMTLF’s over the last 12 months.

FSGCY's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMTLF (100). This means that FSGCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMTLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMTLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMTLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MTCAX67.201.08
+1.63%
MFS Technology A
LGCOX19.15N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Global Equity F3
WCMNX12.83N/A
N/A
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
HGICX49.53N/A
N/A
Hartford Core Equity C
OGRIX33.82N/A
N/A
Invesco Comstock Select R6

FSGCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSGCY and SMTLF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSGCY and SMTLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSGCY
1D Price
Change %
FSGCY100%
N/A
SMTLF - FSGCY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EGIEY - FSGCY
6%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
EDRVY - FSGCY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FOJCF - FSGCY
-0%
Poorly correlated
+3.53%
DRXGF - FSGCY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMTLF and FSGCY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMTLF and FSGCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMTLF
1D Price
Change %
SMTLF100%
N/A
FSGCY - SMTLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VGAS - SMTLF
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.15%
TDWRF - SMTLF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADHI - SMTLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-6.00%
IESVF - SMTLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.48%
More