Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs TBWCX
FSGEX vs TBWCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs TBWCX
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$16.81
Change+$0.08 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.74B
Thornburg Better World International C
Price$19.97
Change+$0.21 (+1.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets517.06M
FSGEX vs TBWCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. TBWCX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a StrongBuy and TBWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 53.7B vs. TBWCX (517M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than TBWCX: FSGEX (2.61) vs TBWCX (0.01). FSGEX was incepted earlier than TBWCX: FSGEX (16 years) vs TBWCX (10 years). TBWCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). TBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.57 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBWCX: FSGEX (0) vs TBWCX (5000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.14 vs. TBWCX (14.32). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 63.64 vs. TBWCX (44.88).
| FSGEX | TBWCX | FSGEX / TBWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.19 | 0% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.55 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.547 | 14.836 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.7B | 517M | 10,387% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 0.01 | 26,622% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.14 | 14.32 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.02 | 36.49 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 63.64 | 44.88 | 142% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement