Ad is loading...
FSGEX vs TBWCX
FSGEX vs TBWCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs TBWCX
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$14.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.22B
Thornburg Better World International C
Price$18.08
Change+$0.14 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets493.43M
FSGEX vs TBWCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. TBWCX commentary
Jan 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a StrongBuy and TBWCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 50.2B vs. TBWCX (493M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than TBWCX: FSGEX (2.77) vs TBWCX (0.37). FSGEX was incepted earlier than TBWCX: FSGEX (15 years) vs TBWCX (9 years). TBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.89 vs. FSGEX (6.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBWCX: FSGEX (0) vs TBWCX (5000). TBWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.96 vs. FSGEX (11.28). TBWCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.84 vs. FSGEX (25.49).
| FSGEX | TBWCX | FSGEX / TBWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.821 | 3.968 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.2B | 493M | 10,183% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 0.37 | 749% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.28 | 11.96 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.67 | 2.39 | 321% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.49 | 27.84 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.89 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...