Ad is loading...
FSGEX vs TBWCX
FSGEX vs TBWCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs TBWCX
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$14.53
Change+$0.38 (+2.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.22B
Thornburg Better World International C
Price$17.79
Change+$0.27 (+1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets454.93M
FSGEX vs TBWCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. TBWCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Hold and TBWCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 52.2B vs. TBWCX (455M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than TBWCX: FSGEX (2.81) vs TBWCX (0.01). FSGEX was incepted earlier than TBWCX: FSGEX (16 years) vs TBWCX (10 years). TBWCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). TBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.89 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBWCX: FSGEX (0) vs TBWCX (5000). TBWCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.28 vs. FSGEX (1.10). FSGEX (53.22) and TBWCX (50.74) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSGEX | TBWCX | FSGEX / TBWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.19 | 0% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.55 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.212 | 2.300 | -9% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.2B | 455M | 11,473% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.81 | 0.01 | 26,317% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.10 | 5.28 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.69 | 9.92 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.22 | 50.74 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.63 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...