Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSGEX vs TBWCX
FSGEX vs TBWCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs TBWCX
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$16.48
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.74B
Thornburg Better World International C
Price$19.81
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets505.09M
FSGEX vs TBWCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. TBWCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a StrongBuy and TBWCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 53.7B vs. TBWCX (505M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than TBWCX: FSGEX (2.61) vs TBWCX (0.01). FSGEX was incepted earlier than TBWCX: FSGEX (16 years) vs TBWCX (10 years). TBWCX (2.55) is less costly to investors than FSGEX (0.01). TBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.57 vs. FSGEX (3.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBWCX: FSGEX (0) vs TBWCX (5000). FSGEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.37 vs. TBWCX (11.56). FSGEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.61 vs. TBWCX (42.58).
| FSGEX | TBWCX | FSGEX / TBWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.19 | 0% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 2.55 | 0% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.938 | 13.916 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.7B | 505M | 10,634% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.61 | 0.01 | 26,622% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.37 | 11.56 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.85 | 26.93 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.61 | 42.58 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement