Ad is loading...
FSGEX vs TBWCX
FSGEX vs TBWCX Comparison
Open Charts FSGEX vs TBWCX
Fidelity Series Global ex US Index
Price$14.15
Change-$0.01 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Thornburg Better World International C
Price$17.40
Change-$0.02 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FSGEX vs TBWCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSGEX vs. TBWCX commentary
Dec 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSGEX is a Buy and TBWCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSGEX has more cash in the bank: 49.3B vs. TBWCX (487M). FSGEX pays higher dividends than TBWCX: FSGEX (2.77) vs TBWCX (0.37). FSGEX was incepted earlier than TBWCX: FSGEX (15 years) vs TBWCX (9 years). TBWCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.89 vs. FSGEX (6.00). FSGEX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBWCX: FSGEX (0) vs TBWCX (5000). TBWCX (6.96) and FSGEX (6.66) have marching annual gain over last year. TBWCX return over 5 years is better than : 24.35 vs. FSGEX (22.81).
| FSGEX | TBWCX | FSGEX / TBWCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.117 | 5.787 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.3B | 487M | 10,123% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.77 | 0.37 | 749% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.66 | 6.96 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.50 | -2.78 | -162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.81 | 24.35 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.75 | N/A | - |