Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHBX vs LALDX
FSHBX vs LALDX Comparison
Open Charts FSHBX vs LALDX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond
Price$8.51
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.48B
Lord Abbett Short Duration Income A
Price$3.88
Change-$0.01 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.51B
FSHBX vs LALDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHBX vs. LALDX commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHBX is a Hold and LALDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LALDX has more cash in the bank: 42.5B vs. FSHBX (2.48B). LALDX pays higher dividends than FSHBX: LALDX (5.01) vs FSHBX (4.15). FSHBX was incepted earlier than LALDX: FSHBX (39 years) vs LALDX (32 years). LALDX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FSHBX (0.30). LALDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. FSHBX (68.00). FSHBX has a lower initial minimum investment than LALDX: FSHBX (0) vs LALDX (1500). LALDX (6.53) and FSHBX (6.26) have marching annual gain over last year. LALDX return over 5 years is better than : 13.18 vs. FSHBX (8.76).
| FSHBX | LALDX | FSHBX / LALDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.58 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.30 | 0.58 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.091 | 3.100 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.48B | 42.5B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.15 | 5.01 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 6.53 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.28 | 13.72 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.76 | 13.18 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.89 | 27.44 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers