Ad is loading...
FSHCX vs VGHCX
FSHCX vs VGHCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHCX vs. VGHCX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHCX is a Hold and VGHCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VGHCX has more cash in the bank: 38.9B vs. FSHCX (1.14B). VGHCX pays higher dividends than FSHCX: VGHCX (0.86) vs FSHCX (0.54). FSHCX was incepted earlier than VGHCX: FSHCX (39 years) vs VGHCX (41 years). FSHCX (0.68) is less costly to investors than VGHCX (0.35). FSHCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 32.00 vs. VGHCX (16.00). FSHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than VGHCX: FSHCX (0) vs VGHCX (3000). VGHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.98 vs. FSHCX (-14.75). FSHCX return over 5 years is better than : 7.32 vs. VGHCX (-12.74).
| FSHCX | VGHCX | FSHCX / VGHCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.35 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.35 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.690 | -3.860 | -173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 38.9B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.54 | 0.86 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.75 | -13.98 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.67 | -13.11 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.32 | -12.74 | -57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 21.13 | -22.89 | -92% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers