Ad is loading...
FSHOX vs RYLAX
FSHOX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSHOX vs RYLAX
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing
Price$107.46
Change+$1.08 (+1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets717.01M
Rydex Leisure H
Price$76.81
Change+$1.18 (+1.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.3M
FSHOX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHOX vs. RYLAX commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHOX is a Buy and RYLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSHOX has more cash in the bank: 717M vs. RYLAX (9.3M). FSHOX pays higher dividends than RYLAX: FSHOX (0.73) vs RYLAX (0.51). FSHOX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FSHOX (39 years) vs RYLAX (27 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSHOX (0.71). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 214.00 vs. FSHOX (27.00). FSHOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FSHOX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.38 vs. FSHOX (-5.01). FSHOX return over 5 years is better than : 135.37 vs. RYLAX (46.88).
| FSHOX | RYLAX | FSHOX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.65 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.68 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.628 | -5.675 | 187% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 717M | 9.3M | 7,710% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.51 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.01 | 8.38 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.70 | 16.41 | 169% |
| Returns for 5 years | 135.37 | 46.88 | 289% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.30 | 38.02 | 227% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers