Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSHOX vs RYLAX
FSHOX vs RYLAX Comparison
Open Charts FSHOX vs RYLAX
Fidelity Select Construction & Housing
Price$116.85
Change-$0.19 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets722.96M
Rydex Leisure H
Price$85.65
Change+$0.72 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.09M
FSHOX vs RYLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSHOX vs. RYLAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSHOX is a Buy and RYLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSHOX has more cash in the bank: 723M vs. RYLAX (9.09M). FSHOX pays higher dividends than RYLAX: FSHOX (0.71) vs RYLAX (0.48). FSHOX was incepted earlier than RYLAX: FSHOX (39 years) vs RYLAX (27 years). RYLAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FSHOX (0.71). RYLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 214.00 vs. FSHOX (36.00). FSHOX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYLAX: FSHOX (0) vs RYLAX (2500). RYLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.02 vs. FSHOX (4.99). FSHOX return over 5 years is better than : 100.03 vs. RYLAX (34.71).
| FSHOX | RYLAX | FSHOX / RYLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.65 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.68 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.672 | 5.924 | -28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 723M | 9.09M | 7,952% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.48 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.99 | 21.02 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.64 | 38.33 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.03 | 34.71 | 288% |
| Returns for 10 years | 113.55 | 57.39 | 198% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement