Ad is loading...
FSIDX vs PAEAX
FSIDX vs PAEAX Comparison
Open Charts FSIDX vs PAEAX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Div & Inc I
Price$16.79
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.03B
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Gr A
Price$19.48
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.37B
FSIDX vs PAEAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIDX vs. PAEAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIDX is a Buy and PAEAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSIDX has more cash in the bank: 5.03B vs. PAEAX (2.37B). FSIDX pays higher dividends than PAEAX: FSIDX (2.53) vs PAEAX (1.90). FSIDX was incepted earlier than PAEAX: FSIDX (21 years) vs PAEAX (31 years). PAEAX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FSIDX (0.67). PAEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 133.00 vs. FSIDX (36.00). FSIDX (0) and PAEAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSIDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.39 vs. PAEAX (0.39). PAEAX (38.62) and FSIDX (37.18) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FSIDX | PAEAX | FSIDX / PAEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.01 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.01 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.616 | 0.103 | 598% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.03B | 2.37B | 213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.53 | 1.90 | 133% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.39 | 0.39 | 1,390% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.07 | 26.36 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.18 | 38.62 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.40 | 32.54 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers