Ad is loading...
FSIUX vs RMEBX
FSIUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSIUX vs RMEBX
Invesco Dividend Income R5
Price$25.33
Change-$0.90 (-3.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.6B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$54.45
Change-$1.82 (-3.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.75B
FSIUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. FSIUX (3.6B). FSIUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSIUX (1.79) vs RMEBX (1.18). FSIUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSIUX (19 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSIUX (0.67). FSIUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSIUX: RMEBX (250) vs FSIUX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.63 vs. FSIUX (2.31). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 74.87 vs. FSIUX (57.67).
| FSIUX | RMEBX | FSIUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.687 | 2.774 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.6B | 103B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.18 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.31 | 6.63 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.86 | 11.00 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.67 | 74.87 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.48 | 63.22 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...