Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIUX vs RMEBX
FSIUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSIUX vs RMEBX
Invesco Dividend Income R5
Price$26.97
Change+$0.17 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.6B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.60
Change+$0.43 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.24B
FSIUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. FSIUX (3.6B). FSIUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSIUX (1.65) vs RMEBX (1.16). FSIUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSIUX (20 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSIUX (0.67). FSIUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSIUX: RMEBX (250) vs FSIUX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.50 vs. FSIUX (6.72). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 62.71 vs. FSIUX (47.31).
| FSIUX | RMEBX | FSIUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.680 | 7.315 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.6B | 106B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.65 | 1.16 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.72 | 9.50 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.90 | 25.88 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.31 | 62.71 | 75% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.03 | 74.51 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement