Ad is loading...
FSIUX vs RMEBX
FSIUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSIUX vs RMEBX
Invesco Dividend Income R5
Price$25.66
Change+$0.07 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.48B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
FSIUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIUX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. FSIUX (3.48B). FSIUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSIUX (1.75) vs RMEBX (1.21). FSIUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSIUX (20 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSIUX (0.67). FSIUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSIUX: RMEBX (250) vs FSIUX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. FSIUX (1.37). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. FSIUX (40.50).
| FSIUX | RMEBX | FSIUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.641 | 1.203 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.48B | 101B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.75 | 1.21 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.37 | 5.19 | 26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.89 | 16.77 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.50 | 55.02 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.18 | 58.89 | 73% |