Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSIUX vs RMEBX
FSIUX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts FSIUX vs RMEBX
Invesco Dividend Income R5
Price$27.79
Change+$0.10 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.7B
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$60.75
Change+$0.28 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.07B
FSIUX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSIUX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSIUX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 110B vs. FSIUX (3.7B). FSIUX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: FSIUX (1.57) vs RMEBX (1.12). FSIUX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: FSIUX (20 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSIUX (0.67). FSIUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FSIUX: RMEBX (250) vs FSIUX (1000000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.26 vs. FSIUX (7.78). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.35 vs. FSIUX (43.96).
| FSIUX | RMEBX | FSIUX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.07 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.330 | 11.253 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.7B | 110B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.12 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.78 | 11.26 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.13 | 30.31 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.96 | 59.35 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.55 | 80.17 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement