Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSKAX vs FSMDX
FSKAX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts FSKAX vs FSMDX
Fidelity Total Market Index
Price$164.19
Change+$0.07 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.88B
FSKAX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSKAX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSKAX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSKAX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. FSMDX (40.4B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FSKAX: FSMDX (1.14) vs FSKAX (1.09). FSKAX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: FSKAX (14 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). FSMDX (0.03) is less costly to investors than FSKAX (0.01). FSMDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 8.00 vs. FSKAX (3.00). FSKAX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSKAX (10.78) and FSMDX (10.54) have marching annual gain over last year. FSKAX return over 5 years is better than : 101.87 vs. FSMDX (71.02).
| FSKAX | FSMDX | FSKAX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.03 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 0.03 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.887 | 1.925 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 106B | 40.4B | 262% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.14 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.78 | 10.54 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.57 | 46.52 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 101.87 | 71.02 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 209.37 | 107.84 | 194% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement