Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLZX vs FSMDX
FSLZX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts FSLZX vs FSMDX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selec Mid Cp Z
Price$44.87
Change-$0.08 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.2B
FSLZX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLZX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLZX is a StrongBuy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. FSLZX (2.2B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FSLZX: FSMDX (1.14) vs FSLZX (0.78). FSLZX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: FSLZX (8 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). FSLZX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSLZX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.27 vs. FSLZX (3.84). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 63.08 vs. FSLZX (34.52).
| FSLZX | FSMDX | FSLZX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.03 | 2,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.03 | 2,200% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.200 | 1.866 | -11% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.2B | 40.4B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 1.14 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.84 | 10.27 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.18 | 28.17 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.52 | 63.08 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 111.08 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement