Ad is loading...
FSLZX vs FSMDX
FSLZX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts FSLZX vs FSMDX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selec Mid Cp Z
Price$39.70
Change-$1.62 (-3.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$30.10
Change-$1.10 (-3.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
FSLZX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLZX vs. FSMDX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLZX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. FSLZX (2.34B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FSLZX: FSMDX (1.20) vs FSLZX (0.81). FSLZX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: FSLZX (8 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). FSLZX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSLZX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.30 vs. FSLZX (-4.20). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 75.82 vs. FSLZX (50.61).
| FSLZX | FSMDX | FSLZX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.03 | 2,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.03 | 2,200% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.259 | -7.610 | 109% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 37.6B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 1.20 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.20 | -0.30 | 1,384% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.60 | 10.14 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.61 | 75.82 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 87.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...