Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSLZX vs FSMDX
FSLZX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts FSLZX vs FSMDX
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selec Mid Cp Z
Price$47.19
Change+$0.33 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.76
Change+$0.20 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
FSLZX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSLZX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSLZX is a Buy and FSMDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. FSLZX (2.17B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than FSLZX: FSMDX (1.31) vs FSLZX (0.75). FSLZX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: FSLZX (8 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). FSLZX (0.55) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). FSLZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSLZX (0) and FSMDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.28 vs. FSLZX (9.68). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 76.62 vs. FSLZX (50.52).
| FSLZX | FSMDX | FSLZX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.03 | 2,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.03 | 2,200% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.041 | 5.556 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 42.4B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 1.31 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.68 | 15.28 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.74 | 46.71 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.52 | 76.62 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 119.96 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers