FSM
Price
$6.63
Change
+$0.15 (+2.31%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
SVRSF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

FSM vs SVRSF

Header iconFSM vs SVRSF Comparison
Open Charts FSM vs SVRSFBanner chart's image
Fortuna Mining
Price$6.63
Change+$0.15 (+2.31%)
Volume$13.99M
Capitalization1.13B
SILVER STORM MINING
Price$0.10
Change+$0.01 (+11.11%)
Volume$961.2K
CapitalizationN/A
FSM vs SVRSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FSM vs. SVRSF commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSM is a StrongBuy and SVRSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FSM: $6.63 vs. SVRSF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: FSM and SVRSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FSM: 84% vs. SVRSF: 176%
Market capitalization -- FSM: $1.13B vs. SVRSF: $0
FSM [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1.13B. SVRSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FSM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSVRSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FSM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SVRSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SVRSF is a better buy in the long-term than FSM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SVRSF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SVRSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SVRSF is a better buy in the short-term than FSM.

Price Growth

FSM (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.78% price change this week, while SVRSF (@Precious Metals) price change was -7.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

FSM is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.62% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSM YTD gains are higher at: 54.545 vs. SVRSF (41.090).
FSMSVRSFFSM / SVRSF
Capitalization1.14BN/A-
EBITDA231MN/A-
Gain YTD54.54541.090133%
P/E Ratio26.81N/A-
Revenue842MN/A-
Total Cash128MN/A-
Total Debt264MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FSM vs SVRSF: Fundamental Ratings
FSM
SVRSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8083
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100
SMR RATING
1..100
62100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4145
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SVRSF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FSM (63) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SVRSF’s stock grew similarly to FSM’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SVRSF (100) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to SVRSF’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's SMR Rating (62) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SVRSF (100) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SVRSF’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SVRSF (45) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to SVRSF’s over the last 12 months.

FSM's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SVRSF (100) in the null industry. This means that FSM’s stock grew similarly to SVRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FSMSVRSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SVRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CWVCX20.65N/A
N/A
Calvert International Equity C
YAFIX19.93N/A
N/A
AMG Yacktman Focused I
JHQRX33.20N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Hedged Equity R6
FSAVX56.42N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Automotive Port
DRLYX8.47N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Developed Markets RE Scs - Y

FSM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSM has been closely correlated with AG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSM jumps, then AG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSM
1D Price
Change %
FSM100%
+2.31%
AG - FSM
78%
Closely correlated
+2.82%
EXK - FSM
76%
Closely correlated
+2.50%
MAG - FSM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
HL - FSM
72%
Closely correlated
+2.92%
PAAS - FSM
72%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
More

SVRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SVRSF and TRX have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SVRSF and TRX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SVRSF
1D Price
Change %
SVRSF100%
+0.84%
TRX - SVRSF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.43%
SSVFF - SVRSF
25%
Poorly correlated
+12.00%
ASM - SVRSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
FSM - SVRSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
NSUPF - SVRSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.83%
More