Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HIMCX
FSMAX vs HIMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HIMCX
FSMAX vs HIMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HIMCX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and HIMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. HIMCX (647M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HIMCX: FSMAX (0.49) vs HIMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HIMCX: FSMAX (15 years) vs HIMCX (29 years). HIMCX (0.76) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX (0) and HIMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.47 vs. HIMCX (-13.98). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.87 vs. HIMCX (-46.00).
| FSMAX | HIMCX | FSMAX / HIMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.76 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.76 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.894 | -7.716 | -167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 647M | 6,198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.47 | -13.98 | -96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.41 | -15.07 | -427% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.87 | -46.00 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 130.70 | -31.57 | -414% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement