Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs HIMCX
FSMAX vs HIMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs HIMCX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.11
Change+$0.76 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
Hartford MidCap HLS IA
Price$29.10
Change+$0.07 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets790.35M
FSMAX vs HIMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. HIMCX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and HIMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. HIMCX (790M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than HIMCX: FSMAX (0.47) vs HIMCX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than HIMCX: FSMAX (14 years) vs HIMCX (28 years). HIMCX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). HIMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX (0) and HIMCX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. HIMCX (3.09). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 57.69 vs. HIMCX (-21.35).
| FSMAX | HIMCX | FSMAX / HIMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.74 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.74 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.818 | 2.326 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 790M | 4,962% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.49 | 3.09 | 437% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.36 | -3.04 | -1,724% |
| Returns for 5 years | 57.69 | -21.35 | -270% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.51 | -26.18 | -296% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement