Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs MIMSX ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
FSMAX vs MIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MIMSX
Fidelity® Extended Market Index
Price$73.68
Change+$0.42 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy I
Price$17.19
Change+$0.30 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs MIMSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FSMAX vs. MIMSX commentary
Dec 05, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and MIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 32.9B vs. MIMSX (1.49B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MIMSX: FSMAX (1.30) vs MIMSX (0.18). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MIMSX: FSMAX (12 years) vs MIMSX (22 years). MIMSX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MIMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.34 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIMSX: FSMAX (0) vs MIMSX (10000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.08 vs. MIMSX (-6.25). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 25.95 vs. MIMSX (2.66).
| FSMAX | MIMSX | FSMAX / MIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.15 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.067 | 11.479 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 10000 | - |
| Net Assets | 32.9B | 1.49B | 2,204% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.30 | 0.18 | 742% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.08 | -6.25 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.08 | -19.91 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.95 | 2.66 | 977% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.98 | 18.32 | 284% |