Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs MIMSX
FSMAX vs MIMSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs MIMSX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.83
Change+$0.48 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy I
Price$14.41
Change+$0.07 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets689.46M
FSMAX vs MIMSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. MIMSX commentary
Jul 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and MIMSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. MIMSX (689M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than MIMSX: FSMAX (0.47) vs MIMSX (0.10). FSMAX was incepted earlier than MIMSX: FSMAX (14 years) vs MIMSX (24 years). MIMSX (1.18) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). MIMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.97 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIMSX: FSMAX (0) vs MIMSX (10000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.06 vs. MIMSX (-11.12). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 60.90 vs. MIMSX (-16.46).
| FSMAX | MIMSX | FSMAX / MIMSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.18 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.18 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.618 | 4.291 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 10000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 689M | 5,689% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.10 | 463% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.06 | -11.12 | -135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.16 | -13.53 | -371% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.90 | -16.46 | -370% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.60 | -6.12 | -1,236% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement