Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NCTWX
FSMAX vs NCTWX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NCTWX
FSMAX vs NCTWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NCTWX commentary
Jul 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and NCTWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 43.5B vs. NCTWX (947M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NCTWX: FSMAX (0.48) vs NCTWX (0.07). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NCTWX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NCTWX (43 years). NCTWX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NCTWX (0.32). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NCTWX: FSMAX (0) vs NCTWX (100000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.80 vs. NCTWX (-10.34). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.88 vs. NCTWX (-14.56).
| FSMAX | NCTWX | FSMAX / NCTWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.59 | 6% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.59 | 6% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.258 | 6.419 | 191% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.5B | 947M | 4,593% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 0.07 | 686% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.80 | -10.34 | -182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.69 | 0.08 | 65,137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.88 | -14.56 | -219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 128.67 | 25.92 | 497% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers