Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs NNTWX
FSMAX vs NNTWX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs NNTWX
FSMAX vs NNTWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. NNTWX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and NNTWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. NNTWX (964M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than NNTWX: FSMAX (0.50) vs NNTWX (0.02). FSMAX was incepted earlier than NNTWX: FSMAX (15 years) vs NNTWX (21 years). NNTWX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FSMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. NNTWX (0.32). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NNTWX: FSMAX (0) vs NNTWX (500). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. NNTWX (-5.31). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. NNTWX (-15.11).
| FSMAX | NNTWX | FSMAX / NNTWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.90 | 4% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 0.90 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 8.902 | 190% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 964M | 4,160% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.02 | 2,391% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | -5.31 | -446% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | 6.06 | 1,200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | -15.11 | -266% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | 20.80 | 647% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers