Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs RCMFX
FSMAX vs RCMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RCMFX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$78.74
Change-$5.91 (-6.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.55B
Schwartz Value Focused
Price$54.53
Change-$3.66 (-6.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.26M
FSMAX vs RCMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RCMFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Buy and RCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 36.5B vs. RCMFX (84.3M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RCMFX: FSMAX (0.53) vs RCMFX (0.38). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RCMFX: FSMAX (14 years) vs RCMFX (41 years). RCMFX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). RCMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCMFX: FSMAX (0) vs RCMFX (2500). RCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.16 vs. FSMAX (3.80). RCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 189.24 vs. FSMAX (106.28).
| FSMAX | RCMFX | FSMAX / RCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.26 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.29 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.855 | 10.355 | -66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.5B | 84.3M | 43,298% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.38 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.80 | 24.16 | 16% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.54 | 41.92 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 106.28 | 189.24 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.10 | 144.41 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers