Ad is loading...
FSMAX vs RCMFX
FSMAX vs RCMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs RCMFX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$94.51
Change+$0.64 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.78B
Schwartz Value Focused
Price$58.13
Change+$0.32 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets65.49M
FSMAX vs RCMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. RCMFX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and RCMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.8B vs. RCMFX (65.5M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than RCMFX: FSMAX (1.10) vs RCMFX (0.57). FSMAX was incepted earlier than RCMFX: FSMAX (13 years) vs RCMFX (41 years). RCMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCMFX: FSMAX (0) vs RCMFX (2500). RCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.07 vs. FSMAX (26.14). RCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 110.79 vs. FSMAX (48.39).
| FSMAX | RCMFX | FSMAX / RCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.994 | 10.241 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.8B | 65.5M | 62,290% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.57 | 193% |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.14 | 40.07 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.40 | 64.49 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.39 | 110.79 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.18 | 147.29 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers