Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TMDPX
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TMDPX
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$95.16
Change+$0.81 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.17B
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth N
Price$17.23
Change+$0.13 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.59B
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TMDPX commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a StrongBuy and TMDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 39.2B vs. TMDPX (1.6B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMDPX: FSMAX (0.47) vs TMDPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMDPX: FSMAX (14 years) vs TMDPX (20 years). TMDPX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TMDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. FSMAX (9.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMDPX: FSMAX (0) vs TMDPX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.35 vs. TMDPX (4.91). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 61.12 vs. TMDPX (-8.31).
| FSMAX | TMDPX | FSMAX / TMDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.07 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.07 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.818 | 8.709 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.2B | 1.6B | 2,458% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.35 | 4.91 | 374% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.55 | 27.80 | 178% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.12 | -8.31 | -735% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.50 | -11.54 | -689% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement