Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMAX vs TMDPX
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison
Open Charts FSMAX vs TMDPX
FSMAX vs TMDPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMAX vs. TMDPX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMAX is a Hold and TMDPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40.1B vs. TMDPX (1.68B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than TMDPX: FSMAX (0.50) vs TMDPX (0.00). FSMAX was incepted earlier than TMDPX: FSMAX (15 years) vs TMDPX (21 years). TMDPX (1.06) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). TMDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMDPX: FSMAX (0) vs TMDPX (2000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.68 vs. TMDPX (-3.25). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 40.14 vs. TMDPX (-24.01).
| FSMAX | TMDPX | FSMAX / TMDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.04 | 1.06 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.937 | 9.234 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.1B | 1.68B | 2,384% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.68 | -3.25 | -729% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.74 | 16.32 | 446% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.14 | -24.01 | -167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.49 | -9.10 | -1,478% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers