Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GCMCX
FSMDX vs GCMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GCMCX
FSMDX vs GCMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GCMCX commentary
Jul 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and GCMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. GCMCX (1.15B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GCMCX: FSMDX (0.76) vs GCMCX (0.33). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GCMCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GCMCX (29 years). GCMCX (1.95) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GCMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCMCX: FSMDX (0) vs GCMCX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.15 vs. GCMCX (1.98). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 41.98 vs. GCMCX (-20.14).
| FSMDX | GCMCX | FSMDX / GCMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.94 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.95 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.891 | 14.341 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 1.15B | 4,630% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.33 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.15 | 1.98 | 918% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.66 | 8.56 | 627% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.98 | -20.14 | -208% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.37 | -4.92 | -3,384% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement