Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GCMTX
FSMDX vs GCMTX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GCMTX
FSMDX vs GCMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GCMTX commentary
Sep 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and GCMTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. GCMTX (1.14B). GCMTX pays higher dividends than FSMDX: GCMTX (0.86) vs FSMDX (0.75). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GCMTX: FSMDX (15 years) vs GCMTX (19 years). GCMTX (0.95) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GCMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and GCMTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.23 vs. GCMTX (4.24). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.07 vs. GCMTX (-9.76).
| FSMDX | GCMTX | FSMDX / GCMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.94 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.95 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.030 | 15.425 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.14B | 4,650% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.86 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.23 | 4.24 | 430% |
| Returns for 3 years | 55.83 | 19.26 | 290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.07 | -9.76 | -411% |
| Returns for 10 years | 163.52 | 17.52 | 933% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement