Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GCMUX
FSMDX vs GCMUX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GCMUX
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value R6
Price$36.33
Change-$0.49 (-1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
FSMDX vs GCMUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GCMUX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GCMUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 40.4B vs. GCMUX (1.05B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GCMUX: FSMDX (1.14) vs GCMUX (1.04). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GCMUX: FSMDX (14 years) vs GCMUX (10 years). GCMUX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GCMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCMUX: FSMDX (0) vs GCMUX (5000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.03 vs. GCMUX (0.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 73.33 vs. GCMUX (30.63).
| FSMDX | GCMUX | FSMDX / GCMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.83 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.83 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.421 | -0.466 | -305% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.4B | 1.05B | 3,833% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 1.04 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.03 | 0.67 | 1,507% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.08 | 8.55 | 492% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.33 | 30.63 | 239% |
| Returns for 10 years | 108.65 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement