Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GCMUX
FSMDX vs GCMUX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GCMUX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.98
Change+$0.22 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value R6
Price$38.07
Change+$0.22 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
FSMDX vs GCMUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GCMUX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GCMUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. GCMUX (1.1B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GCMUX: FSMDX (1.31) vs GCMUX (1.01). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GCMUX: FSMDX (14 years) vs GCMUX (10 years). GCMUX (0.83) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GCMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GCMUX: FSMDX (0) vs GCMUX (5000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.46 vs. GCMUX (6.80). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 78.71 vs. GCMUX (35.80).
| FSMDX | GCMUX | FSMDX / GCMUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.83 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.83 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.803 | 4.301 | 158% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 1.1B | 3,858% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.01 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.46 | 6.80 | 242% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.44 | 11.96 | 405% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.71 | 35.80 | 220% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement