Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs GMCUX
FSMDX vs GMCUX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GMCUX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$31.34
Change-$1.81 (-5.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Value R6
Price$14.72
Change-$1.10 (-6.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.36M
FSMDX vs GMCUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GMCUX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and GMCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. GMCUX (144M). GMCUX (1.23) and FSMDX (1.20) have matching dividends . FSMDX was incepted earlier than GMCUX: FSMDX (14 years) vs GMCUX (10 years). GMCUX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GMCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMCUX: FSMDX (0) vs GMCUX (5000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.57 vs. GMCUX (-1.45). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 118.86 vs. GMCUX (95.97).
| FSMDX | GMCUX | FSMDX / GMCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.07 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.836 | -4.699 | 39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 144M | 26,111% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.23 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | -1.45 | -316% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.46 | -4.63 | -290% |
| Returns for 5 years | 118.86 | 95.97 | 124% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.53 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers