Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GMCUX
FSMDX vs GMCUX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GMCUX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.95
Change+$0.36 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Equity R6
Price$16.73
Change+$0.22 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets142.22M
FSMDX vs GMCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GMCUX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GMCUX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. GMCUX (142M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GMCUX: FSMDX (1.31) vs GMCUX (1.16). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GMCUX: FSMDX (14 years) vs GMCUX (10 years). GMCUX (1.07) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GMCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 67.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMCUX: FSMDX (0) vs GMCUX (5000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.10 vs. GMCUX (-0.34). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.04 vs. GMCUX (56.14).
| FSMDX | GMCUX | FSMDX / GMCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.07 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.645 | -0.542 | -1,041% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 142M | 29,859% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 1.16 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.10 | -0.34 | -2,966% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.07 | 18.37 | 256% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.04 | 56.14 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement