Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs GSMCX
FSMDX vs GSMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GSMCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$36.21
Change-$0.17 (-0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$38.57
Change-$0.30 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
FSMDX vs GSMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GSMCX commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and GSMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. GSMCX (1.11B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GSMCX: FSMDX (1.31) vs GSMCX (0.99). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GSMCX: FSMDX (14 years) vs GSMCX (30 years). GSMCX (0.84) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). GSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSMCX: FSMDX (0) vs GSMCX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.54 vs. GSMCX (4.45). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 71.66 vs. GSMCX (32.47).
| FSMDX | GSMCX | FSMDX / GSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.84 | 3% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.990 | 6.377 | 125% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 1.11B | 3,806% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.99 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.54 | 4.45 | 282% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.57 | 5.61 | 687% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.66 | 32.47 | 221% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.52 | 2.42 | 5,141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement