Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs GSMCX
FSMDX vs GSMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs GSMCX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.00
Change+$0.18 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.02B
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Instl
Price$37.97
Change+$0.27 (+0.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.16B
FSMDX vs GSMCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. GSMCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and GSMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37B vs. GSMCX (1.16B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than GSMCX: FSMDX (1.28) vs GSMCX (0.81). FSMDX was incepted earlier than GSMCX: FSMDX (13 years) vs GSMCX (29 years). GSMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. FSMDX (9.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSMCX: FSMDX (0) vs GSMCX (1000000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.14 vs. GSMCX (12.31). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 54.11 vs. GSMCX (11.27).
| FSMDX | GSMCX | FSMDX / GSMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.642 | 3.914 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37B | 1.16B | 3,195% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.81 | 158% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.14 | 12.31 | 172% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.66 | -4.01 | -515% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.11 | 11.27 | 480% |
| Returns for 10 years | 124.41 | 1.83 | 6,804% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...