Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LVOFX
FSMDX vs LVOFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LVOFX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.91
Change+$0.16 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
Lord Abbett Value Opportunities F
Price$19.28
Change+$0.09 (+0.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.13B
FSMDX vs LVOFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LVOFX commentary
Jul 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LVOFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. LVOFX (1.13B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LVOFX: FSMDX (1.31) vs LVOFX (0.11). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LVOFX: FSMDX (14 years) vs LVOFX (18 years). LVOFX (1.04) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LVOFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX (0) and LVOFX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.08 vs. LVOFX (0.36). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 76.99 vs. LVOFX (19.22).
| FSMDX | LVOFX | FSMDX / LVOFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.04 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.120 | -2.142 | -286% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 1.13B | 3,746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.11 | 1,202% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.08 | 0.36 | 4,482% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.42 | 11.88 | 382% |
| Returns for 5 years | 76.99 | 19.22 | 401% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.63 | -5.93 | -2,052% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement