Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs LVORX
FSMDX vs LVORX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs LVORX
FSMDX vs LVORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. LVORX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and LVORX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. LVORX (1.12B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than LVORX: FSMDX (0.76) vs LVORX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than LVORX: FSMDX (15 years) vs LVORX (19 years). LVORX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). LVORX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX (0) and LVORX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.04 vs. LVORX (7.65). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.92 vs. LVORX (-11.54).
| FSMDX | LVORX | FSMDX / LVORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.41 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.41 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.243 | 12.202 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 1.12B | 4,746% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.04 | 7.65 | 223% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.69 | 14.24 | 349% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.92 | -11.54 | -372% |
| Returns for 10 years | 161.20 | -0.21 | -78,078% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement