Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs PECAX
FSMDX vs PECAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs PECAX
FSMDX vs PECAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. PECAX commentary
Aug 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and PECAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. PECAX (253M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than PECAX: FSMDX (0.76) vs PECAX (0.15). FSMDX was incepted earlier than PECAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs PECAX (34 years). PECAX (1.21) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). PECAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than PECAX: FSMDX (0) vs PECAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.66 vs. PECAX (3.72). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 50.79 vs. PECAX (-19.47).
| FSMDX | PECAX | FSMDX / PECAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.09 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.21 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 34 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.038 | 13.902 | 144% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 253M | 20,593% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.15 | 502% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.66 | 3.72 | 636% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.30 | 21.48 | 309% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.79 | -19.47 | -261% |
| Returns for 10 years | 173.08 | -14.54 | -1,191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement