Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs PECAX
FSMDX vs PECAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs PECAX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.98
Change+$0.22 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.38B
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity A
Price$16.58
Change+$0.09 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets341.94M
FSMDX vs PECAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. PECAX commentary
Jul 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and PECAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 42.4B vs. PECAX (342M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than PECAX: FSMDX (1.31) vs PECAX (0.18). FSMDX was incepted earlier than PECAX: FSMDX (14 years) vs PECAX (33 years). PECAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). PECAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than PECAX: FSMDX (0) vs PECAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.46 vs. PECAX (9.20). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 78.71 vs. PECAX (8.07).
| FSMDX | PECAX | FSMDX / PECAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.09 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.22 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.803 | 0.546 | 1,246% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.4B | 342M | 12,398% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.31 | 0.18 | 727% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.46 | 9.20 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.44 | 10.39 | 466% |
| Returns for 5 years | 78.71 | 8.07 | 975% |
| Returns for 10 years | 123.56 | -22.02 | -561% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement