Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs RCMFX
FSMDX vs RCMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RCMFX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$31.98
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
Schwartz Value Focused
Price$55.50
Change-$0.04 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.39M
FSMDX vs RCMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RCMFX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and RCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. RCMFX (82.4M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RCMFX: FSMDX (1.20) vs RCMFX (0.38). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RCMFX: FSMDX (14 years) vs RCMFX (41 years). RCMFX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). RCMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCMFX: FSMDX (0) vs RCMFX (2500). RCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.15 vs. FSMDX (4.26). RCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 143.88 vs. FSMDX (80.78).
| FSMDX | RCMFX | FSMDX / RCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.26 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.29 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.301 | 5.253 | -101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 82.4M | 45,631% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.38 | 312% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.26 | 20.15 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.18 | 47.74 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.78 | 143.88 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.80 | 131.03 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers