Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs RCMFX
FSMDX vs RCMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RCMFX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$35.48
Change-$0.24 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Schwartz Value Focused
Price$65.10
Change-$0.04 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FSMDX vs RCMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RCMFX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and RCMFX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 36.3B vs. RCMFX (51.8M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RCMFX: FSMDX (1.28) vs RCMFX (0.57). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RCMFX: FSMDX (13 years) vs RCMFX (41 years). RCMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FSMDX (9.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCMFX: FSMDX (0) vs RCMFX (2500). RCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 48.97 vs. FSMDX (31.21). RCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 159.38 vs. FSMDX (60.20).
| FSMDX | RCMFX | FSMDX / RCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.509 | 48.868 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.3B | 51.8M | 70,077% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.28 | 0.57 | 225% |
| Returns for 1 year | 31.21 | 48.97 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.29 | 61.88 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.20 | 159.38 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 121.13 | 136.61 | 89% |