Ad is loading...
FSMDX vs RCMFX
FSMDX vs RCMFX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs RCMFX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$31.34
Change-$1.81 (-5.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets37.64B
Schwartz Value Focused
Price$54.53
Change-$3.66 (-6.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets84.26M
FSMDX vs RCMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. RCMFX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and RCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 37.6B vs. RCMFX (84.3M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than RCMFX: FSMDX (1.20) vs RCMFX (0.38). FSMDX was incepted earlier than RCMFX: FSMDX (14 years) vs RCMFX (41 years). RCMFX (1.29) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). RCMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FSMDX (8.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCMFX: FSMDX (0) vs RCMFX (2500). RCMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.16 vs. FSMDX (4.57). RCMFX return over 5 years is better than : 189.24 vs. FSMDX (118.86).
| FSMDX | RCMFX | FSMDX / RCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.26 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.29 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.836 | 10.355 | -18% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 37.6B | 84.3M | 44,603% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.38 | 312% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.57 | 24.16 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.46 | 41.92 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 118.86 | 189.24 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.53 | 144.41 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers