Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SBMAX
FSMDX vs SBMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SBMAX
FSMDX vs SBMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SBMAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and SBMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 52.1B vs. SBMAX (1.55B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SBMAX: FSMDX (0.76) vs SBMAX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SBMAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SBMAX (28 years). SBMAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SBMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBMAX: FSMDX (0) vs SBMAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.53 vs. SBMAX (-2.41). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 47.15 vs. SBMAX (-21.51).
| FSMDX | SBMAX | FSMDX / SBMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.15 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.15 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.736 | 7.427 | 239% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.1B | 1.55B | 3,361% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.53 | -2.41 | -894% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.59 | 10.05 | 633% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.15 | -21.51 | -219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.80 | 15.83 | 1,053% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers