Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SBMAX
FSMDX vs SBMAX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SBMAX
FSMDX vs SBMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SBMAX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Hold and SBMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.1B vs. SBMAX (1.43B). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SBMAX: FSMDX (0.75) vs SBMAX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SBMAX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SBMAX (28 years). SBMAX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SBMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBMAX: FSMDX (0) vs SBMAX (1000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.86 vs. SBMAX (-11.67). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 40.93 vs. SBMAX (-26.89).
| FSMDX | SBMAX | FSMDX / SBMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.15 | 2% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.15 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.945 | -0.123 | -11,313% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.1B | 1.43B | 3,718% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.86 | -11.67 | -119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.80 | 1.45 | 3,990% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.93 | -26.89 | -152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 165.73 | 10.95 | 1,513% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers