Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SPMCX
FSMDX vs SPMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SPMCX
FSMDX vs SPMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SPMCX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SPMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 53.2B vs. SPMCX (11.1M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SPMCX: FSMDX (0.76) vs SPMCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SPMCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SPMCX (24 years). SPMCX (3.10) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SPMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 152.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPMCX: FSMDX (0) vs SPMCX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.60 vs. SPMCX (-24.69). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.38 vs. SPMCX (-39.72).
| FSMDX | SPMCX | FSMDX / SPMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 3.10 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 3.10 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.810 | 14.745 | 94% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.2B | 11.1M | 479,279% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.76 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.60 | -24.69 | -67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.13 | -22.38 | -220% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.38 | -39.72 | -107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 160.21 | -40.95 | -391% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers