Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FSMDX vs SPMCX
FSMDX vs SPMCX Comparison
Open Charts FSMDX vs SPMCX
FSMDX vs SPMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FSMDX vs. SPMCX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FSMDX is a Buy and SPMCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 51.5B vs. SPMCX (11.2M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than SPMCX: FSMDX (0.99) vs SPMCX (0.00). FSMDX was incepted earlier than SPMCX: FSMDX (15 years) vs SPMCX (24 years). SPMCX (3.10) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). SPMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 152.00 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than SPMCX: FSMDX (0) vs SPMCX (2500). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.46 vs. SPMCX (-17.23). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 42.72 vs. SPMCX (-40.83).
| FSMDX | SPMCX | FSMDX / SPMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 3.10 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 3.10 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.996 | 15.312 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 51.5B | 11.2M | 459,821% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.46 | -17.23 | -130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 59.36 | -17.12 | -347% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.72 | -40.83 | -105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 166.70 | -39.54 | -422% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement