Ad is loading...
FSMUX vs LTNSX
FSMUX vs LTNSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMUX vs LTNSX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.82
Change-$0.04 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.68B
Lord Abbett National Tax Free C
Price$10.43
Change-$0.06 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.75B
FSMUX vs LTNSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. LTNSX (4.75B). FSMUX pays higher dividends than LTNSX: FSMUX (3.59) vs LTNSX (2.83). FSMUX was incepted earlier than LTNSX: FSMUX (4 years) vs LTNSX (29 years). FSMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. LTNSX (41.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTNSX: FSMUX (0) vs LTNSX (1000). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.65 vs. LTNSX (1.93).
| FSMUX | LTNSX | FSMUX / LTNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.451 | -0.477 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 4.75B | 246% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 2.83 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.65 | 1.93 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | -1.16 | -6.24 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -2.59 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 6.18 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers