Ad is loading...
FSMUX vs LTNSX
FSMUX vs LTNSX Comparison
Open Charts FSMUX vs LTNSX
Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond
Price$8.92
Change+$0.01 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.75B
Lord Abbett National Tax Free C
Price$10.52
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.77B
FSMUX vs LTNSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMUX has more cash in the bank: 11.7B vs. LTNSX (4.77B). FSMUX pays higher dividends than LTNSX: FSMUX (3.59) vs LTNSX (2.83). FSMUX was incepted earlier than LTNSX: FSMUX (4 years) vs LTNSX (29 years). FSMUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 117.00 vs. LTNSX (41.00). FSMUX has a lower initial minimum investment than LTNSX: FSMUX (0) vs LTNSX (1000). FSMUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.07 vs. LTNSX (3.05).
| FSMUX | LTNSX | FSMUX / LTNSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.885 | 0.568 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.7B | 4.77B | 246% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 2.83 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.07 | 3.05 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.13 | -1.39 | -226% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -4.64 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 7.86 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...